Many people who are going through a property chain have to decide whether to use one solicitor to do both the purchase of a new home and the sale of their old one. A single point of contact is very appealing. Nevertheless, such a decision is not always advisable for everyone. If you are contemplating on this route, especially when you are selecting property sale solicitors, it is important to consider the practical implications.

Unified Handling of Transactions

One can opt for the same legal firm that is overseeing a leg of a property chain to prevent unnecessary logistics. Since the solicitor already knows your circumstances and timelines, he or she can coordinate each process in parallel. Usually, this unity in oversight leads to lower communication gaps and is achieved through one system for administration of legal documents.

Efficiency Through Central Communication

With one legal team you have streamlined dialogue. The updates about one transaction are more likely to inform decisions in the other. No lengthy introductions or sharing context between two different firms is required. This usually results in accelerated time to have the document reviewed, signed, and responded to.

Lower Legal Costs in Some Cases

Hiring the same solicitor may also reduce fees. Some firms offer discounted packages for combined services. Administrative duplication is avoided, and legal professionals can handle both matters without repeating basic procedures such as identity checks or client onboarding. These cost efficiencies may appeal to budget-conscious movers.

Risk of Overloading One Practice

Despite potential savings and speed, complications may arise if the solicitor becomes overstretched. Handling two interdependent transactions simultaneously requires precise coordination. A busy conveyancer may face bottlenecks, especially during peak periods. According to insights from local conveyancers from Entry Conveyancing, clear communication and proactive document management are key to minimizing delays. Delays on either side of the chain can cascade into frustrating holdups.

Conflicting Timelines or Priorities

Issues develop when the timelines for selling and buying drift out of sync. If one deal stalls—due to survey problems, slow lenders, or buyer indecision—it can jeopardise the other. A single solicitor may be forced to prioritise one side, potentially creating a conflict of interest or impacting efficiency.

Potential for Conflict of Interest

In rare scenarios, problems arise if the same solicitor must act for two parties involved in a chain. Professional guidelines prohibit conflicts, and most firms will refuse dual representation if they cannot remain impartial. If complications develop, they may be obliged to withdraw entirely, leaving you without legal representation mid-process.

Convenience vs Customisation

Choosing one legal representative can offer convenience, but it might compromise personalisation. Firms juggling both tasks may adopt a one-size-fits-all strategy. While this speeds up standard transactions, complex property matters—such as listed buildings, leaseholds, or unusual land titles—might benefit from a specialist focused solely on one side of the deal.

When a Split Approach Makes Sense

If you’re purchasing a property with unique legal requirements, or selling under non-standard terms, separate solicitors might be advisable. Dedicated experts can delve deeper into specific legal nuances without being distracted by the demands of another transaction. This is especially true when properties are located in different regions, with differing legal or council requirements.

Final Considerations Before Choosing

Answers to the question of how to structure your legal support is not universal. The clarity and cohesion that some clients want is in opposition to bespoke service and dedicated focus that others want. Before appointing anyone, have your solicitor explain their approach to dual transactions, and whether they envisage capacity issues and where the contingency plans are in the event timelines diverge. In the end, using the same solicitor is convenient and may save money. But it depends on that solicitor’s ability to steer a course between those two processes without diluting either. Do not be afraid to explore other routes if yours makes you more than feel constrained.

Reply

or to participate

Keep Reading

No posts found